工作论文
当前位置:首页 > 工作论文
量化宽松政策、财富效应与企业出口
阅读全文         下载全文
TitleQuantitative Easing, Wealth Effect and Export  
作者张靖佳 孙浦阳 刘澜飚  
AuthorZhang Jingjia,Sun Puyang and Liu Lanbiao  
作者单位南开大学 
OrganizationNanKai University 
作者Emailvanillajiajia@163.com;puyangsun@nankai.edu.cn;liulanbiao@vip.sina.com 
中文关键词量化宽松政策 跨国财富效应 出口贸易 企业所有制 
Key Wordsquantitative easing, cross-border wealth effect, export, enterprise ownership 
内容提要本文拓展了量化宽松政策的封闭凯恩斯模型,首次运用开放宏观经济框架揭示了量化宽松政策对出口贸易的跨国财富效应,提出发达国家量化宽松政策对发展中国家的企业出口行为差异化影响的理论模型与假说。同时,本文基于中国海关的企业-产品级别微观数据,使用倍差法,以2001-2006的日本量化宽松政策为案例,检验了量化宽松政策对我国企业出口行为的影响。结论发现:和理论的预期相吻合,发达国家的量化宽松政策使我国企业对外出口量显著增加,特别是提高了外资企业的出口能力;同时,该政策导致我国外商投资出口企业对量化宽松政策实施国的出口市场占比下降,表明该政策冲击的汇率升值压力大于国际资本流动增加压力。我们通过最近邻匹配法建立实验组和对照组样本,有效地验证了不同所有制企业对量化宽松政策出口行为存在显著差异,与本文模型假说及推论一致。我国应警惕发达国家量化宽松政策实施和退出时带来的我国出口总量的波动,同时从汇率和国际资本流动两方面熨平波动带来的负面影响。 
AbstractWe developed the Keynesian model of closed economy for quantitative easing policy, and reveal the cross-border wealth effect on export from quantitative easing through an open macro-economy perspective for the first time. Based on theoretical analysis, we initiate a theoretical model and hypothesis on exporters' heterogeneity in developing countries under the political shock of quantitative easing in developed countries. Meanwhile, we use the detailed firm-product data from Chinese customs and apply difference in difference method to test the behavior of exporters in China under the background of Japanese quantitative easing during 2001-2006. Our results show that, in line with the findings from our theoretical model, quantitative easing in developed countries stimulates the export volume of Chinese firms, especially for foreign invested ones. However, quantitative easing knocks down the export ratio of Chinese foreign invested firms to the developed countries with such policy, which indicates the shock from exchange rate appreciation is larger than the shock of increasing international capital flow. By using PSM to establish the test group and control group, we effectively test the heterogeneity of exporting behavior responds among different types of ownership under the shock of quantitative easing, and derive results in accordance with our theoretical analysis. It's better for our government to be alert about the fluctuation of export volume brought by the implementation and tapering of quantitative easing policies in developed countries, and smooth the negative effect from the aspects of exchange rate and international capital flow. 
文章编号WP812 
登载时间2015-02-03 
  • 主管单位:中国社会科学院     主办单位:中国社会科学院经济研究所
  • 经济研究杂志社版权所有 未经允许 不得转载     京ICP备10211437号
  • 本网所登载文章仅代表作者观点 不代表本网观点或意见 常年法律顾问:陆康(重光律师事务所)
  • 国际标准刊号 ISSN 0577-9154      国内统一刊号 CN11-1081/F       国内邮发代号 2-251        国外代号 M16
  • 地址:北京市西城区阜外月坛北小街2号   100836
  • 电话/传真:010-68034153
  • 本刊微信公众号:erj_weixin