工作论文
当前位置:首页 > 工作论文
实质性创新还是策略性创新?——宏观产业政策对微观企业创新的影响
阅读全文         下载全文
TitleIs it Substantive Innovation or Strategic Innovation?——The Impact of Macroeconomic Policies on Micro-enterprise Industry I  
作者黎文靖 郑曼妮  
AuthorLi Wengji and Zheng Manni  
作者单位暨南大学管理学院 
OrganizationSchool of Management, Jinan University 
作者Emailtliwenjing@jnu.edu.cn 
中文关键词产业政策 企业创新 政府补贴 税收优惠 
Key WordsIndustrial Policy; Enterprise Innovation; Government Subsidy; Tax Incentives 
内容提要本文采用2001年至2010年沪深A股上市公司的专利申请数据,分析产业政策对企业创新行为的影响及其内部机理。研究发现,受产业政策激励的公司,当年的专利申请显著增加,但只是非发明专利显著增加,追求“数量”而忽略“质量”;当公司预期将获得更多的政府补贴和税收优惠时,其专利申请、特别是非发明专利申请显著增加,产业政策的财税扶持手段使企业为了“寻扶持”而创新。进一步对企业分组分析发现,上述现象在国企组、非高新技术行业组中显著;在非国企组、高新技术行业组中不显著;说明产业政策并不能激发企业进行实质性创新,企业为了“寻扶持”而增加创新“数量”的行为只是一种策略性创新。然而,发明专利申请的增加才能提高企业的市场价值,实质性创新才能促进企业发展。本文认为,中国在制定产业政策时,应尽可能避免基于政府的选择进行资源配置,而是维护市场机制,利用市场竞争激发企业创新,推动产业转型升级,实现经济长久发展。 
AbstractUsing the sample of Chinese A-share listed companies in patent application data from 2001 to 2010, we analyzed the influence of industry policy on enterprise innovation activities and its internal mechanisms. The research found that when the firms were incentive by industry policy, the number of their patent applications increased significantly. However, this phenomenon occurred just in the group of non-invention patent applications, which means that these firms pursued “innovation by numbers” and ignored “the quality of innovation”. When firms expected that they would obtain more subsidies and tax incentives, the number of their patent applications, especially the number of their non-invention patent applications increased significantly, which means that the support of industry policy induced enterprise to innovate for“support seeking”. Then, to further analyze these phenomena above, we divide the firms into SOE group and non-SOE group, as well as high-tech industry group and non- high-tech industry group. The result of the further analysis is that these phenomena above were significant in SOE group and non- high-tech industry group, but not significant in non-SOE group and high-tech industry group, which indicated that industry policy could not inspire substantial innovation, and the enterprise innovation aiming at “support seeking” was strategic innovation. However, the more the number of the invention patent applications increased, the more the company's market value improved, which means that did substantial innovation could promote the development of enterprises. This paper argued that when Chinese government formulates his industrial policies, he should avoid as far as possible to base on the government's choice when allocating the resources. Instead, he should preserve the market mechanism, and make use of the market competition to stimulate innovation, in order to promote industrial restructuring and upgrading, and to achieve economic development for a long run. 
文章编号WP922 
登载时间2015-09-22 
  • 主管单位:中国社会科学院     主办单位:中国社会科学院经济研究所
  • 经济研究杂志社版权所有 未经允许 不得转载     京ICP备10211437号
  • 本网所登载文章仅代表作者观点 不代表本网观点或意见 常年法律顾问:陆康(重光律师事务所)
  • 国际标准刊号 ISSN 0577-9154      国内统一刊号 CN11-1081/F       国内邮发代号 2-251        国外代号 M16
  • 地址:北京市西城区阜外月坛北小街2号   100836
  • 电话/传真:010-68034153
  • 本刊微信公众号:erj_weixin